Day 47

March 7, 2025

4 documented events

  1. Major Abuse of Power Civil Rights

    Coercion of Universities: Funding Freezes, Research Cuts, and Demands for Political Compliance

    The Trump administration froze or canceled billions in university funding to coerce political compliance, including $400 million canceled from Columbia (which paid a $221 million settlement), $2.2 billion frozen from Harvard (which refused to comply and won a court order), $250+ million in NIH grants terminated at Columbia's medical center, and investigations opened against 60 universities. The administration demanded Columbia suspend protesters, change admissions, place departments under 'academic receivership,' and ban protest masks — all within one week. NIH funding was cut 24% overall, and the administration proposed a 44% budget reduction.

  2. Serious Rights Violation Corruption & Self-Dealing

    DOGE Employees Matched Social Security Data with Voter Rolls to Pursue Voter Fraud Claims

    DOGE employees at the Social Security Administration secretly consulted with a political advocacy group about using Americans' Social Security data to cross-reference state voter rolls in pursuit of voter fraud allegations. One DOGE staffer signed a 'Voter Data Agreement' with the group in his capacity as an SSA employee. The employees were referred to a federal watchdog for potential Hatch Act violations, and SSA's inspector general opened an investigation in 2026.

  3. Serious Rights Violation Federal Dismantlement

    Report finds DOGE layoffs may 'overwhelm' unemployment system

    CNBC reports that the scale of DOGE-directed layoffs threatens to overwhelm the unemployment insurance system designed for federal workers, which was never built to handle mass separations of this magnitude.

  4. Major Abuse of Power Corruption & Self-Dealing

    Head of Office of the Pardon Attorney fired

    Trump fires career DOJ attorney Liz Oyer, head of the Office of the Pardon Attorney, and installs political loyalist Ed Martin. The office had traditionally served as a nonpartisan filter evaluating clemency petitions on their merits.